BETTER
✕ REPEAL407/2003

Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriön asetus taksitaksasta

2003· Transport
8/10
Growth friction
7/10
Complexity
5/10
Compliance cost
10/10
Simplification potential
2.0 M€
Estimated annual cost
2.0 M€
Savings potential

Purpose

The decree sets maximum taxi fares (base fare, per-km fare, waiting charges and surcharges) and taximeter usage rules.

Analysis

Taxi fare regulation was effectively abolished by the Transport Services Act (320/2017) effective 1.7.2018, which deregulated taxi pricing. This decree is either dead letter or conflicts with current law. Maximum fare regulation prevents price competition in both directions: cheaper operators cannot differentiate and premium services cannot emerge. Fixed fare classes (I–IV by passenger count), advance booking surcharge bans for certain trips, and detailed taximeter rules block new business models (dynamic pricing, app-based dispatch). Cost: compliance monitoring, meter sealing and fare inspections estimated at 0.5–1 M€/year; deadweight loss from competition restriction estimated at several million euros annually.

Verdict reasoning

Taxi fare regulation was effectively abolished by the Transport Services Act (320/2017) effective 1.7.2018, which deregulated taxi pricing. This decree is either dead letter or conflicts with current law. Maximum fare regulation prevents price competition in both directions: cheaper operators cannot differentiate and premium services cannot emerge. Fixed fare classes (I–IV by passenger count), advance booking surcharge bans for certain trips, and detailed taximeter rules block new business models (dynamic pricing, app-based dispatch). Cost: compliance monitoring, meter sealing and fare inspections estimated at 0.5–1 M€/year; deadweight loss from competition restriction estimated at several million euros annually.

Other transport laws

Analysis by Claude Opus 4.6 AI. Estimates are indicative.